The
last ten days appear to have shaken the world in general. News junkies will have been aware of COVID-19
since the beginning of the year. I made
some long flights to and from in the US in late January and I wore a face mask,
even though only a couple of cases had been diagnosed in the US and none in
Latin America. I was not the only one,
perhaps 1/20 were doing it. However, the
announcement of the World Health Organization on March 11 that there was an
official pandemic coincided with the beginning of the drop of the stock markets
worldwide. These came only a day or two after the first two positive cases were
identified here in Bolivia. Bolivia
announced the grounding of flights from Europe, with the last one arriving
Friday the 13th in the morning.
I
think that many around the world realized that “IT” had arrived. The transitional president of Bolivia
announced sweeping measures that came into place on Monday the 16th
of March. With less than 10 confirmed
cases nationally, and no related deaths, an 1800 to 0500 curfew came into being. The workday was shortened from 0800 to 1300
and intercity and interdepartmental land travel was prohibited, with a few flights
are still happening between cities. Starting at midnight on the 21st
of March we are going to 14 days of “total lockdown”.
These
measures have been prudent and decisive given Bolivia´s woeful, on average, government
health care system. There are allegedly 234
Intensive Care units for a country of 11 million but these are already 90%
occupied[1]. There are allegedly 6 respirators in Santa
Cruz a city of well over 1 million inhabitants.
The last few nights (with a muted interlude for Father´s Day) my town in
the Bolivian Amazon has been far quieter than that it has in the 25 years I
have lived here. It is occurring to many
people that it will take a long time to get back to normal, and that normal may
be very different from how things were two weeks ago.
But
it was not until the 20th of march that the following idea really
hit me: Food is going to get scarce. It is going be scarce in relative terms
everywhere and this scarcity will hit the most vulnerable soonest, longest and
hardest. We do not know how long this scarcity will last. When food is perceived to be scarce the price
goes up and the poorest become even more vulnerable.
In
Bolivia´s case, the more successful the country is at “lowering the infection curve”
and we have just about the lowest curve so far, the longer the country is going
to have to close borders severing our food supply chains. The country is - on
paper - a net food exporter due to relatively extensive soya production on the
southern edge of the Amazon. However
most of the food that most of the people eat on daily basis has come
increasingly from Peru, Chile, Brazil and Argentina, in that order. Simply put, over the last 14 years it has
become much cheaper to import foods, even our historical potato, than to
produce them in country. All of our
neighboring countries have a “sharper Covid-19 curve” than Bolivia so far
so. At what point will Bolivia feel it
can open its borders? We could see a
time when the government will have to decide “do we let older people die at a
faster rate or do we let people get increasingly insecure with respect to food”.
How
long could this last? My town has lived
off of ecotourism for over 25 years, but the last tourists have left and who
knows when they will be back in significant numbers. International flights have essentially
stopped worldwide; airline employees are being laid off. The pandemic will have to be more or less
over before the airlines rehire, even longer before people resume coming to
visit the Andes and Amazon. And even
longer before local people are back to affording as much food as they could two
weeks ago. Much of the country depends
on mining, the products of which were bought, on average, by China (who also
has bought our soya). When will China be
buying more minerals? The national
government depends on oil income. When
will oil prices come back up again?
Critical
thinkers will realize that it is much broader than Bolivia. It is an essential issue everywhere. Nobody in the world has antibodies for this virus,
unless they were infected in the last three months, and recovered. Clearheaded estimates suggest that the
disease will calm down when populations have 70 to 80% resistance between those
that have immunity and those that have been vaccinated[2].
Angela Merkel was criticized for having said as much[3]
yet at the same time Germany is apparently among the countries that have dealt best
with the crisis, as measured by death rate of confirmed cases. A vaccine is
reportedly many months away, and 70% of resistance is a long, long, long way
away.
In
another example, a significant part of Chile’s economy is based on producing
fruit for the North American market. But
borders are closed. Food will rot where
it is, harvesters will lose their jobs, these people will have less money to
buy food, in an area where some foodstuffs are rotting. There will be less food in the US, though
presumably people can find alternatives to Chilean grapes and cherries. Yet the internal organization of food
production in the US is considered to have been broken since I was in university
in the early 80s. One example that I am familiar with recently is the case of
West Virginia which is considered to be the state with the most fresh water per
capita in the US, along with some of the highest rates of unemployment. Yet it imports much, if not most, of its food
from California which has a chronic, severe water shortage, chronic
agricultural labor shortages, and is thousands of miles away. West Virginia has more natural resources than
necessary to feed its population. But
the system is broken.
Today
the Guardian had an article quoting a British Food Policy expert and the title
was “We are in serious trouble: The other crisis – our food supply”[4]. Among
the relevant and timely quotes from Tim Lang was “We (Britain) have a massively fragile just-in-time-for market supply
chain which could easily collapse, a
depleted agriculture sector which produces around 50% of the food we actually
eat, leaving us at the mercies of the international markets, and production
methods which are damaging to the environment and human health.”
In
this view the increasingly broken systems of food production and supply chains
around the world will really break under the strain of the Covid-19 pandemic. Many
friends and colleagues are saying “Good, the system needed radical changing
anyway”. There are common issues to what
is happening very quickly with the pandemic, and what we would expect to happen
if human-induced climate change were not addressed. Paul R. Ehrlich has recently written an
article on the interconnectedness of these issues in considerable detail[5],
but that is not my purpose.
The
issue that has come the fore of my mind is that whether we rebuild the old,
broken system, or build a new, untested system, it is months if not years
away. In the meantime, the most
vulnerable people in our societies, many of whom were food insecure in the
system that we had up to two weeks ago, are headed for a cliff. Though worldwide the percentage of people
suffering from different forms and degrees of malnutrition has been dropping
over the last 3 decades, these improvements are not locked in, they are not
guaranteed. If supply chains are
disrupted these hard-won improvements could quickly erode.
My
objectives are not to simply add to the doomsday talk. They are instead to alert people to an issue
that is not yet widely appreciated, but also to urge a possible, partial
solution: plant a garden.
By
one estimate 88% of the world’s population lives north of the equator (Figure
1). That means that for most of the
world’s population NOW is when you should be starting your garden, or helping
other people to expand and tend to their gardens. I believe that it is compatible with
appropriate social distancing and the need for people to get fresh air and exercise. And if I am wrong, then at least you will
have access to some nutritious food over the next few months (Figure 2.)
Figure 1. The World´s Population in 2000, by Latitude. Source: Bill Rankin quoted in https://www.themarysue.com/world-population-latitude-longitude/ |
I
conclude by remarking that as a soil scientist and agroecologist I had only a smattering
of philosophy in my education and one of the few things that has stayed with me
is Candide by Voltaire. In it a young optimistic man along with his
mentor, Professor Pangloss, start out in Eden and move through the world expounding
the philosophy that "all is for the best" in the "best of all
possible worlds". It is an allegorical
novel that satirizes the religious and philosophical idea that everything bad happens
for a greater purpose. Horrible things
happen to Candide in each chapter, war, rape, shipwreck, he ends up in South
America, gets captured and almost cooked by a tribe called los Orejones. All of this time Candide says that “all is
for the best”. Finally at the end of the
book he decides that he cannot change the world and that he that he should just
go cultivate his garden.
I
identified with this concept at the time and have ever since:
That in this world where horrible things happen, to stay sane you “must
go cultivate your garden”.
A
literal translation of the French “Il
faut cultiver notre jardin” would be “what is lacking, is for us to
cultivate our garden.”
In
these days of accelerating bad news, social distancing, quarantine, pandemic
and likely severe disruption of food chains, what is lacking is for everybody
who can, to go cultivate your garden.
Figure 3. My mother helping us to start a garden on our farm in La Buitrera, Cordillera Central, Colombia. 1991. |
[1] https://www.noticiasfides.com/nacional/sociedad/la-situacion-de-la-terapia-intensiva-en-bolivia-para-enfrentar-el-coronavirus-403946
[2] https://www.wired.com/story/coronavirus-interview-larry-brilliant-smallpox-epidemiologist/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=onsite-share&utm_brand=wired&utm_social-type=earned&fbclid=IwAR2NfFHhaeRpXvhqEBSgI4bfvaFIukqoqBOKZQcCqOznumB3BAYYDbp28yw
[3] https://www.businessinsider.com/angela-merkel-estimates-coronavirus-will-hit-large-majority-german-population-2020-3
[4] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/22/tim-lang-interview-professor-of-food-policy-city-university-supply-chain-crisis?CMP=share_btn_fb&fbclid=IwAR2mgFeQ1eWI1RMcl-sGn_0m9B2O1T6Zmb2HW1kjI27obgg7y0vY6k578U0
[5] https://www.dailyclimate.org/pandemic-population-covid-19-2645545497.html?fbclid=IwAR3qd5Cwy5xxXvx6dIXrfDnEB2Gsv-D4_k3ZrSLxRrqgAcb0JKt28xWsIYA
Thank you, Dan, for reminding us to look ahead instead of bemoaning our disrupted lives. I've never planted a garden (in West Virginia, everyone shared with us!) but may seriously consider it now. Water is definitely the issue here in the Central Valley of California, though.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if you do not have allotments in your town. The land would be previously tilled, and you would be around experienced gardeners who would know how to best use the limited water.
DeleteI once traveled with man who had cherry orchards in Washington, California and Chile. California is really too warm for cherries so they spray mist in the air to cool the air down so that the trees think it is cold weather. A waste of time since Ohio and thereabouts can produce cherries without irrigation, but they have their harvest when the price is low. In California because the water is subsidized, they produce wasteful cherries, but when the price is high. Insane.
Dan